Galatians 3:15-29
"Are There Really
No Jews or Greeks, Slaves or Free, Male or Female?"
Dialogue Sermon....
Richard:
The text we are about to share is mountainous. It is one of those Pauline peaks
that looks easy
from a distance. But the closer you get, the more fearsome it becomes. Few ever
make the
summit of this text to take in Paul's breathtaking view of Christian community.
Even though we
Presbyterians love that mountaintop — "In Christ there is no Jew or Greek, slave
or free, male or
female" — we almost always settle for snapshots from disposable cameras.
Hear the Word of the Lord:
15Brothers and sisters, I give an example from daily life:
once a person's will has been ratified, no one adds to it or annuls it.
16Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring;
it does not say, "And to offsprings," as of many; but it says, "And to your offspring,"
that is, to one person, who is Christ.
My point is this:
17 the law, which came four hundred thirty years later,
does not annul a covenant previously ratified by God,
so as to nullify the promise.
18For if the inheritance comes from the law, it no longer comes from the promise;
out God granted it to Abraham through the promise.
Why then the law?
19 It was added because of transgressions,
until the offspring would come to whom the promise had been made; and
it was ordained through angels by a mediator.
20Now a mediator involves more than one party; but God is one.
21Is the law then opposed to the promises of God?
Certainly not!
For if a law had been given that could make alive,
then righteousness would indeed come through the law.
22But the scripture has imprisoned all things under the power of sin,
so that what was promised through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ1
might be given to those who believe.
23Now before faith came, we were imprisoned and guarded under the law
until faith would be revealed.
24Therefore the law was our disciplinarian until Christ came,
so that we might be justified by faith.
25But now that faith has come, we are no longer subject to a disciplinarian,
26for in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith.
27As many of you as were baptized into Christ
have clothed yourselves with Christ.
28There is no longer Jew or Greek,
there is no longer slave or free,
there is no longer male and female;
for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.
29And if you belong to Christ,
then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to the promise.
The Word of the Lord
Thanks be to God
Elizabeth
Richard introduced this text as a mountain to be climbed. I say it is a lifeboat
in the stormy seas.
This text has rescued women like me from Corinthian verses which tell me to wear
a hat, sit
down and shut up. It has been the lifeboat for African-Americans, rescuing them
from the
Ephesians’ mandate that slaves should "obey [their] masters with fear and
trembling, in
singleness of heart, as [they] obey Christ." It is a refuge, a safe harbor, for
all whose God-given
particularity has marginalized them in the dominant cultures of church and
society. This
beautiful text about our perfect one-ness in Christ has "scattered the proud in
the thoughts of
their hearts, has brought down the powerful from their thrones, and lifted up
the lowly"
(Luke 1.46-55).
The
fervent debate about this verse concerns two issues:
1) whether to translate the
genitive ( evk pi,stewj
1 VIhsou/ Cristou/ ) objectively
("faith in Jesus Christ" - referring largely to the believer’s faith) or
subjectively
("faith of Jesus Christ" - referring to Jesus’ faithfulness); and
2) how to
translate Paul’s use of the common Greek
noun for faith ( pi,stij
); does he mean "faith" (more akin to "belief") or "faithfulness"? These issues
are of
enormous weight in discerning Paul’s theology.
Richard
Wait a minute! I know you’re being a well-intentioned Presbyterian, but you
can’t just smooth
over all our differences and act as if we’re just one big, happy, family in
which all members are
treated with gospel equality. You know perfectly well that’s not the case — that
we’re still a lot
more like the Galatians than we think, demanding that "gentiles" get circumcised
before they can
be truly saved. You know that in many ways we Presbyterians are still demanding
that certain
believers be "circumcised" or judged according to the law before they can truly
belong to God’s
frozen chosen. Look at our congregations, for heaven’s sake. Do you think that
just because
Paul said it 2,000 years ago, that settled it? Just because Paul said "There is
no longer white or
brown believer, no longer lower or upper class believer, no longer male or
female believer" —
does that really mean our church is living out this radically new life together?
Elizabeth
No, we’re not living out the truth of our baptism very well, but it’s better now
than it used to be.
For instance, in my own hometown church, I can serve as interim pastor and the
church is
content to have you, the male, as pastor’s spouse. That would not have happened
twenty years
ago. And thirty years ago we Presbyterians were still divided into northern and
southern
branches of the church – divided because of slavery a hundred years earlier. Now
we are more
united across racial-ethnic lines than ever before, thanks to the courage of
those who led the civil
rights movement with Paul’s great notion of our equality as their theme song.
Yet the power of
these transforming words have yet to make our communion as full and rich as it
could be. We
love the idea of inclusiveness but living it out is not as easy as we pretend.
Richard
I grant you we’ve made progress. But I’m afraid that in settling for a communion
that’s less than
full, we’ll begin to imagine ourselves having arrived on the mountaintop. That’s
really what was
happening with the Galatians: they had relaxed most of the Jewish law regarding
membership in
the covenant family, but they were still requiring that gentiles be circumcised
before they could
truly belong. They had settled into a church community that was not as full and
rich and free as
it could be because they thought they were doing "well enough." Do you think
Paul was happy
with that? No! Paul wrote his angriest letter to the Galatians, accusing them of
deserting God
and turning to a different gospel (Galatians 1.6). And that’s why Paul goes far
beyond the
Jewish-gentile distinction, to include the distinctions of slave and free, male
and female. Not
only race, but class and gender — politics and sexuality. Do you see how
far-reaching Paul is?
Elizabeth
Yes, I know Paul was being radical. For most of his life Paul had obediently
recited from the
Jewish prayer book words like these:
"Blessed are You, Lord, our God, King of the universe, for
gentile...for not having made me a slave...for not having made me a woman."2
The man who uttered those words every morning was so transformed by Christ that he had the
nerve to overturn every one of those blessings:
"There is no longer Jew or Greek; there is no longer slave or free; there is no longer male and female."
This blessing actually postdates Paul, as it is recorded in the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Menahot 43b. 2However, its record in the Talmud is likely a reflection of earlier Jewish practice. This blessing, as it is quoted here, can still be found in the Jewish prayerbook, The Complete ArtScroll Siddur, trans. Rabbi Nosson Scherman, ed.
Rabbi Nosson Scherman and Rabbi Meir Zlotowitz (Brooklyn, NY: Mesorah Publications, Ltd., 1984-95), p. 19.
The Jewish community has added an alternative for women: "Blessed are You, HASHEM, our God, King of the universe, for having made me according to His will." "HASHEM" is the transliteration of the Hebrew for "the Name" and it is read instead of the actual text — YHWH — which is the sacred four-letter personal Name that God gave Moses from the burning bush in Exodus 3.13-16.The Jewish prayerbook commentary explaining this awkward daily blessing reads: "The Torah assigns missions to respective groups of people. Within Israel, for example, the Davidic family, Kohanim, and Levites are set apart by virtue of their particular callings, in addition to their shared mission as Jews. All such missions carry extra responsibilities and call for the performance of the mitzvos [commandments] associated with them. We thank God, therefore, for the challenge of improving His universe in accordance with His will. Male, free Jews have responsibilities and duties not shared by others. For this, they express gratitude that, unlike women, they were not freed from the obligation to perform time-related commandments. This follows the Talmudic dictum that an obligatory performance of a commandment is superior to a voluntary one, because it is human nature to resist obligations. Women, on the other hand, both historically and because of their nature, are the guardians of tradition, the molders of character, children, and family.
Furthermore, women have often been the protectors of Judaism when the impetuosity and aggressiveness of the male nature led the men astray. The classic precedent was in the Wilderness when the men — not the women — worshiped the Golden Calf. Thus, though women were not given the privilege of the challenge assigned to men, they are created closer to God's ideal of satisfaction. They express their gratitude in the blessing '...for having made me according to His will' (R' Munk)."
Richard
I actually think Paul is stuffing these particularities right in the Galatians’
face. I think he wants
the Galatians to confront their differences from one another in race, status,
and gender, so that
they will grasp the incredible gospel of their acceptance by God. Paul wants the
Galatians to
confront their differences.
Elizabeth
You mean he wants them to confront their
one-ness in Christ. Why are you emphasizingdifferences when Paul is emphasizing same-ness? Let’s talk about unity in Christ!
Richard
But we cannot faithfully talk about unity with one another unless we seriously
confront our
differences. Aren’t you the first to remind me that women think and behave and
pastor
differently from men? Isn’t Paul saying that it really
some heterosexual, some rich, some educated, some disabled, some children of divorce? Isn’t
Paul trying to communicate that we can’t actually be one people in Christ until we believe we
are individual persons loved by Christ? Isn’t it only when we believe Christ loves each of us
just as we are that we finally grasp the radical goodness of Paul’s gospel: each one of us, by the
mercy of God alone in Christ, equally the heir of Abraham and Sarah? So I think Paul is forcing
the Galatians to face their particular races, classes, and genders in order to clarify the gospel.
Elizabeth
The gospel, however, is ultimately about our
unity in Christ. But unity that does not appreciatedifferences is a false unity. We are created equally in God’s image but not identically in God’s
image. We express God’s image differently. So what we should strive for is a unity that
embraces diversity. But, frankly, diversity makes us uncomfortable. We say our church doors
and baptismal font are open to everyone, but we prefer people who think like us and act like us
and look like us. We greet those who are different from us with less enthusiasm or with a
contrived, exaggerated enthusiasm that betrays our discomfort. We get nervous when those
different from us challenge our notions of what it means to be God’s faithful people.
Richard
And being "God’s faithful people" means that when we look at one another —
eye-to-eye — the
first thing we see standing before us is an heir of Abraham and Sarah, a child
of the living God.
That’s the first thing we must see when we look into each other’s eyes.
we should see is how exceedingly different we are from one another. Only then will we see
what a truly motley family Sarah and Abraham have. Only then will we marvel at God’s
inclusive grace in Jesus Christ.
Elizabeth
And only then will we remember that the differences in this family are more than
skin deep; they
cannot be ignored. Our different ethnicities, economics, genders, sexual
identities, actually
affect the way we receive and pass on God’s grace. So we cannot simply brush
them aside in the
name of superficial unity. To live out the unity which God gives us in Christ
requires that we
listen deeply to one another — and keep listening deeply. And that’s not easy.
Richard Elliott Friedman,
Commentary on the Torah (New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 2001), p. 3 382, reminds us that "the [Jewish] law...is pervaded with the notion of distinction: between priest and layperson, between holy and secular, between pure and impure, between Israel and the other nations, between good and bad, and sometimes simply between permitted and forbidden with not reasons given...[and] the priest's task [is to] distinguish."Richard
No, it’s agonizing. Do you remember what Peter Paris, the Princeton sociologist,
said when we
asked him what it takes for black and white, rich and poor, educated and
uneducated Christians
to dwell together in meaningful unity? I’ll never forget it. He said it takes a
"commitment to
uneasiness."
into uniformity.
Elizabeth
Christian unity is never uniformity. Paul is absolutely convinced that "the
fullness of time has
come" (Gal. 4.4), that the age of the Law with its power to separate people from
one another is
finished. Paul is convinced that the new creation in Christ has begun. This is
the age of faith
with its power to unite. "Now that faith has come, we are no longer subject to a disciplinarian,
for in Christ Jesus [we] are all children of God through faith" (Gal. 3.24-25).
Richard
I think what Paul is saying here to the Galatians is this: Never forget that
this family of Abraham
and Sarah’s contains both
Jews and Greeks, both
slaves and free, both
women and men. Don’t
let your one-ness keep you from celebrating your
differences.
Elizabeth
And I think he’s saying that the family of faith contains
neither Jews nor Greeks, neither slavesnor free, neither women nor men. Don’t let your differences keep you from celebrating your one-ness.
Thanks be to God, who in the mercy of Jesus Christ, makes each one of us a
perfectly equal heir of Abraham and Sarah. Amen.
Elizabeth & Richard Deibert
Presbytery of Coastal Carolina
Thursday, 17 June 2004
Community Presbyterian Church, Pinehurst, North Carolina
